Richard Kolb
2014-03-18 08:26:00 UTC
+1 for upgrading your Java.
Java 8 gets released today and with all the fanatic work AdoptOpenJDK has
done, the upgrade should much easier than Java 7.
Java 8 gets released today and with all the fanatic work AdoptOpenJDK has
done, the upgrade should much easier than Java 7.
I'd stick with what you currently have working. However, I would use this
as a stick to push your organization to upgrade. 1.6 is really old.
as a stick to push your organization to upgrade. 1.6 is really old.
Ouch, that's disappointing.
So users ...what would you do? Stick with 2.6 until my big slow
organization upgrades our JVMs to 1.7, or remain in the dark ages with
jaxrs 1.x knowing I'll at least get some critical patches if needed. Dang,
this sucks!
So users ...what would you do? Stick with 2.6 until my big slow
organization upgrades our JVMs to 1.7, or remain in the dark ages with
jaxrs 1.x knowing I'll at least get some critical patches if needed. Dang,
this sucks!
Works for me.
-Noah
"All
not
out
server
-Noah
That seems to be a broken link. It redirects to
https://home.java.net/?force=689Gili
https://java.net/projects/jersey/lists/commits/archive/2014-03/message/109Seems like Java SE 7 is required now, just saw this pop up on the
Folks - Jersey documentation regarding java SE compatibility says
Jersey components are compiled with Java SE 6 target.", but that's
the case with this latest 2.7 release. A number of components have
manifest files that say Build-Jdk: 1.7.0_51, and of course it bombs
manifest files that say Build-Jdk: 1.7.0_51, and of course it bombs
on my 1.6 containers.
Are going to get a jdk 1.6 build? (pretty please)
Also, after swapping out jackson for moxy for my json stuff, my
Are going to get a jdk 1.6 build? (pretty please)
Also, after swapping out jackson for moxy for my json stuff, my
startups got MUCH slower, anyone experience this?